Attorney firings and the politicization of the Civil Rights Division sometime in September or even earlier.
the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee hoped that some agreement could be reached with the White House and his committee could hear testimony when Congress returns from its summer recess in September, saying he hopes the White House will accept this decision and finally.
But if there was a political calculation in withholding testimony by Rove, Miers, and White House officials, is that going to actually lhelp the Republicans in the fall elections?By then, of course, either Barack Obama or John McCain will be president of the United States.Congress but parties to a small claims court.Bates went on to say that he doubted very much that if the White House appealed his decision, they had even a remote possibility of prevailing: The aspect of this lawsuit that is unprecedented is the notion that former mytoys gutschein White House Counsel Harriett Miers one.The scathing opinion said: The executive cannot identify a single judicial opinion that recognizes immunity for senior presidential advisors in this or any other context.So at a minimum, the Justice Department is likely to release two devastating reports on the Bush administration this fall or even earlier.Also geschenke verpacken kinder what might not be a good omen for what might be in that report is that a federal grand jury is reportedly considering criminal charges against one former senior Bush administration appointee in the Civil Rights Division, Bradley Schlozman.Testimony about the firings.S.Attorneys and other allegations of White House misuse of the Justice Department.
Republican House and Senate candidates are no doubt going to be damaged by the executive privilege claims becoming a front and center issue just prior to the election.
When Dan Bartlett was White House counselor, he was an influential advocate too often overruled because of advice proferred the President from Dick Cheney and other hardliners of pre-emption and full pubic disclosure.
But as Johanna Neuman of the.
That is inevitable as the.S.Judge John Bates rebuked the Bush administration for what he said was their unprecedented claim of executive privilege.Late last week, a Federal District Court Judge had scathing words for the Bush administration for claiming executive privilege for refusing to allow former senior White House aides to testify before Congress about the firings of nine.S.And so for that high minded editorial reason, I am not going to offer an opinion as to whether the White House has delayed testimony on the.S.For now, the executive privilege debate has been relegated to the back pages of newspapers and it might appear to be smart politics to stand tough in the face of congressional subpoenas.The dog days of summer, a Summer Olympics, a presidential election and even other administration scandals have largely drowned out the issue of the firing of the nine.S.The continuous claims of executive privilege whatever the motive for them being invoked are going to appear more and more to the pubic part and parcel of a cover.Attorneys was not in that class.Inasmuch as Bates was appointed to the bench by President Bush in 2001 and once worked for Whitewater Special Prosecutor Kenneth.Besides McCains candidacy, hearing would surely even do more harm to Republican congressional candidates who do not have network newscasts and advertising budgets to distance themselves from President Bush as many would like to do as their re-election prospects stand in the blance.